Solutions to Chapter 12 Semantic concepts

A. Revisit your answers to exercise 11A. Determine which sentences were tautologies, which were contradictions, and which were neither tautologies nor contradictions.

  1. 1.

    AA Tautology

  2. 2.

    C¬C Neither

  3. 3.

    (AB)¬(A¬B) Tautology

  4. 4.

    (AB)(BA) Tautology

  5. 5.

    (AB)(BA) Tautology

  6. 6.

    ¬(AB)(¬A¬B) Tautology

  7. 7.

    [(AB)¬(AB)]C Contradiction

  8. 8.

    [(AB)C]B Tautology

  9. 9.

    ¬[(CA)B] Neither

B. Use truth tables to determine whether these sentences are jointly satisfiable, or jointly unsatisfiable:

  1. 1.

    AA, ¬A¬A, AA, AA Jointly satisfiable (see line 1)

    A A A ¬ A ¬ A A A A A
    T T T T F T T F T T T T T T T
    F F T F T F T T F F F F F F F
  2. 2.

    AB, AC, BC Jointly satisfiable (see line 1)

    A B C A B A C B C
    T T T T T T T T T T T T
    T T F T T T T F F T F F
    T F T T T T T T T F T T
    T F F T T F T F F F T F
    F T T F T F F T T T T T
    F T F F T T F T F T F F
    F F T F F F F T T F T T
    F F F F F F F T F F T F
  3. 3.

    B(CA), AB, ¬(BC) Jointly unsatisfiable

    A B C B (C A) A B ¬ (B C)
    T T T T T T T T T T T F T T T
    T T F T T F T T T T T F T T F
    T F T F F T T T T F F F F T T
    T F F F F F T T T F F T F F F
    F T T T T T T F F T T F T T T
    F T F T F F F F F T T F T T F
    F F T F F T T F F T F F F T T
    F F F F F F F F F T F T F F F
  4. 4.

    A(BC), C¬A, A¬B Jointly satisfiable (see line 8)

    A B C A (B C) C ¬ A A ¬ B
    T T T T T T T T T F F T T F F T
    T T F T T T T F F T F T T F F T
    T F T T T F T T T F F T T T T F
    T F F T F F F F F T F T T T T F
    F T T F F T T T T T T F F T F T
    F T F F F T T F F T T F F T F T
    F F T F F F T T T T T F F T T F
    F F F F T F F F F T T F F T T F

C. Use truth tables to determine whether each argument is valid or invalid.

  1. 1.

    AAA Invalid (see line 2)

    A A A A
    T T T T T
    F F T F F
  2. 2.

    A(A¬A)¬A Valid

    A A (A ¬ A) ¬ A
    T T F T F F T F T
    F F T F F T F T F
  3. 3.

    A(BA)¬A¬B Valid

    A B A (B A) ¬ A ¬ B
    T T T T T T T F T T F T
    T F T T F T T F T T T F
    F T F F T F F T F F F T
    F F F T F T F T F T T F
  4. 4.

    AB,BC,¬ABC Invalid (see line 6)

    A B C A B B C ¬ A B C
    T T T T T T T T T F T T T T
    T T F T T T T T F F T T F F
    T F T T T F F T T F T F F T
    T F F T T F F F F F T F F F
    T T T F T T T T T T F T T T
    T T F F T T T T F T F T F F
    T F T F F F F T T T F F F T
    T F F F F F F F F T F F F F
  5. 5.

    (BA)C,(CA)B(CB)A Invalid (see line 5)

    A B C (B A) C (C A) B (C B) A
    T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T
    T T F T T T F F F F T T T F F T T T
    T F T F F T T T T T T F F T F F T T
    T F F F F T T F F F T T F F F F T T
    F T T T F F T T T F F T T T T T F F
    F T F T F F T F F F F T T F F T T F
    F F T F F F T T T F F T F T F F T F
    F F F F F F T F F F F T F F F F T F

D. Determine whether each sentence is a tautology, a contradiction, or a contingent sentence, using a complete truth table.

  1. 1.

    ¬BB Contradiction

  2. 2.

    ¬DD Tautology

  3. 3.

    (AB)(BA) Contingent

  4. 4.

    ¬[A(BA)] Contradiction

  5. 5.

    A[A(B¬B)] Contradiction

  6. 6.

    [(AB)B](AB) Contingent

E. Determine whether each the following sentences are logically equivalent using complete truth tables. If the two sentences really are logically equivalent, write “equivalent.” Otherwise write, “Not equivalent.”

  1. 1.

    A and ¬A

  2. 2.

    A¬A and ¬BB

  3. 3.

    [(AB)C] and [A(BC)]

  4. 4.

    A(BC) and (AB)(AC)

  5. 5.

    [A(AB)]B and AB

F. Determine whether each the following sentences are logically equivalent using complete truth tables. If the two sentences really are equivalent, write “equivalent.” Otherwise write, “not equivalent.”

  1. 1.

    AA and AA

  2. 2.

    ¬(AB) and ¬A¬B

  3. 3.

    AB and ¬AB

  4. 4.

    (AB)C and A(BC)

  5. 5.

    A(BC) and A(BC)

G. Determine whether each collection of sentences is jointly satisfiable or jointly unsatisfiable using a complete truth table.

  1. 1.

    A¬B, ¬(AB), BA Consistent

    A ¬ B ¬ (A B) B A
    T F F T F T T T T T T
    T T T F T T F F F T T
    F F F T F F T T T F F
    F F T F F F T F F T F
  2. 2.

    AB, A¬A, B¬B Unsatisfiable

    A B A ¬ A B ¬ B
    T T T T F F T T F F T
    T T F T F F T F T T F
    F T T F T T F T F F T
    F F F F T T F F T T F
  3. 3.

    ¬(¬AB), A¬C, A(BC) Consistent

    ¬ (¬ A B) A ¬ C A (B C)
    F F T T T T F F T T T T T T
    F F T T T T T T F T F T F F
    T F T F F T F F T T T F T T
    T F T F F T T T F T T F T F
    F T F T T F T F T F F T T T
    F T F T T F T T F F T T F F
    F T F T F F T F T F T F T T
    F T F T F F T T F F T F T F
  4. 4.

    AB, A¬B Unsatisfiable

  5. 5.

    A(BC), (AB)C, AC Consistent

H. Determine whether each collection of sentences is jointly satisfiable or jointly unsatisfiable, using a complete truth table.

  1. 1.

    ¬B, AB, A Unsatisfiable

  2. 2.

    ¬(AB), AB, BA Consistent

  3. 3.

    AB, ¬B, ¬B¬A Unsatisfiable

  4. 4.

    AB, ¬B¬A, AB Consistent

  5. 5.

    (AB)C, ¬A¬B, ¬C¬B Consistent

I. Determine whether each argument is valid or invalid, using a complete truth table.

  1. 1.

    AB, BA Invalid

  2. 2.

    AB, BCAC Valid

  3. 3.

    AB, ACBC Invalid.

  4. 4.

    AB, BAAB Valid

J. Determine whether each argument is valid or invalid, using a complete truth table.

  1. 1.

    A[A(AA)]A Invalid

  2. 2.

    AB, BC, ¬BAC Valid

  3. 3.

    AB, ¬A¬B Invalid

  4. 4.

    A, B¬(A¬B) Valid

  5. 5.

    ¬(AB), AB, ABC Valid

K. Answer each of the questions below and justify your answer.

  1. 1.

    Suppose that 𝒜︁ and ℬ︁ are logically equivalent. What can you say about 𝒜︁ℬ︁?

  2. 𝒜︁ and ℬ︁ have the same truth value on every line of a complete truth table, so 𝒜︁ℬ︁ is true on every line. It is a tautology.

  3. 2.

    Suppose that (𝒜︁ℬ︁)𝒞︁ is neither a tautology nor a contradiction. What can you say about whether 𝒜︁,ℬ︁𝒞︁ is valid?

  4. Since the sentence (𝒜︁ℬ︁)𝒞︁ is not a tautology, there is some line on which it is false. Since it is a conditional, on that line, 𝒜︁ and ℬ︁ are true and 𝒞︁ is false. So the argument is invalid.

  5. 3.

    Suppose that 𝒜︁, ℬ︁ and 𝒞︁ are jointly unsatisfiable. What can you say about (𝒜︁ℬ︁𝒞︁)?

  6. Since the sentences are jointly unsatisfiable, there is no valuation on which they are all true. So their conjunction is false on every valuation. It is a contradiction

  7. 4.

    Suppose that 𝒜︁ is a contradiction. What can you say about whether 𝒜︁,ℬ︁𝒞︁?

  8. Since 𝒜︁ is false on every line of a complete truth table, there is no line on which 𝒜︁ and ℬ︁ are true and 𝒞︁ is false. So the entailment holds.

  9. 5.

    Suppose that 𝒞︁ is a tautology. What can you say about whether 𝒜︁,ℬ︁𝒞︁?

  10. Since 𝒞︁ is true on every line of a complete truth table, there is no line on which 𝒜︁ and ℬ︁ are true and 𝒞︁ is false. So the entailment holds.

  11. 6.

    Suppose that 𝒜︁ and ℬ︁ are logically equivalent. What can you say about (𝒜︁ℬ︁)?

  12. Not much. Since 𝒜︁ and ℬ︁ are true on exactly the same lines of the truth table, their disjunction is true on exactly the same lines. So, their disjunction is logically equivalent to them.

  13. 7.

    Suppose that 𝒜︁ and ℬ︁ are not logically equivalent. What can you say about (𝒜︁ℬ︁)?

  14. 𝒜︁ and ℬ︁ have different truth values on at least one line of a complete truth table, and (𝒜︁ℬ︁) will be true on that line. On other lines, it might be true or false. So (𝒜︁ℬ︁) is either a tautology or it is contingent; it is not a contradiction.

L. Consider the following principle:

Suppose 𝒜︁ and ℬ︁ are logically equivalent. Suppose an argument contains 𝒜︁ (either as a premise, or as the conclusion). The validity of the argument would be unaffected, if we replaced 𝒜︁ with ℬ︁.

Is this principle correct? Explain your answer.
The principle is correct. Since 𝒜︁ and ℬ︁ are logically equivalent, they have the same truth table. So every valuation that makes 𝒜︁ true also makes ℬ︁ true, and every valuation that makes 𝒜︁ false also makes ℬ︁ false. So if no valuation makes all the premises true and the conclusion false, when 𝒜︁ was among the premises or the conclusion, then no valuation makes all the premises true and the conclusion false, when we replace 𝒜︁ with ℬ︁.