Solutions to Chapter 39 Rules for identity
A. For each of the following claims, provide an FOL proof that shows it is true.
-
1.
Line number
Subproof level
Formula
Justification
0000DS ,0E ,0E , -
2.
Line number
Subproof level
Formula
Justification
00open subproof, 11E ,1Iclose subproof, open subproof, 11E ,1Iclose subproof, 0E , –, – -
3.
Line number
Subproof level
Formula
Justification
000E0E ,0I -
4.
Line number
Subproof level
Formula
Justification
0open subproof, 11E1E1E ,1E ,1E ,close subproof, 0I – -
5.
Line number
Subproof level
Formula
Justification
00CQ0E0DNE0E0DNEopen subproof, 11E ,1E ,close subproof, 0I –0I0I -
6.
Line number
Subproof level
Formula
Justification
00open subproof, 1open subproof, 2open subproof, 33E ,3E ,close subproof, 2I –2I2Iclose subproof, 1E , –close subproof, 0E , – -
7.
Line number
Subproof level
Formula
Justification
000E0I0E ,0Eopen subproof, 11DS ,1E ,close subproof, 0I –0DNE -
8.
Line number
Subproof level
Formula
Justification
00open subproof, 11E1E ,1E ,close subproof, 0E , – -
9.
Line number
Subproof level
Formula
Justification
00open subproof, 11E1E1E1E1E ,1E1E ,close subproof, 0E , – -
10.
Line number
Subproof level
Formula
Justification
open subproof, 1open subproof, 22E ,2Iclose subproof, open subproof, 22Iclose subproof, 1LEM –, –1Iclose subproof, 0I –
B. Show that the following are interderivable:
-
‣
-
‣
And hence that both have a decent claim to symbolize the English sentence ‘Nick is the F’.
In one direction:
|
Line number |
Subproof level |
Formula |
Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
open subproof,
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
E
|
|
|
1
|
|
E
|
|
|
1
|
|
E
|
|
|
1
|
|
E ,
|
|
|
1
|
|
E
|
|
|
1
|
|
E ,
|
|
|
1
|
|
I ,
|
|
|
close subproof,
0
|
|
E , –
|
And now in the other:
|
Line number |
Subproof level |
Formula |
Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
I
|
|
|
0
|
|
I ,
|
|
|
0
|
|
I
|
C. In appendix 26, we claimed that the following are logically equivalent symbolizations of the English sentence ‘there is exactly one F’:
-
‣
-
‣
-
‣
Show that they are all interderivable. (Hint: to show that three claims are interderivable, it suffices to show that the first proves the second, the second proves the third and the third proves the first; think about why.)
It suffices to show that the first proves the second, the second proves the third and the third proves the first, for we can then show that any of them prove any others, just by chaining the proofs together (numbering lines, where necessary. Armed with this, we start on the first proof:
|
Line number |
Subproof level |
Formula |
Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
E
|
|
|
0
|
|
E
|
|
|
open subproof,
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
E
|
|
|
1
|
|
E
|
|
|
open subproof,
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
I ,
|
|
|
2
|
|
E ,
|
|
|
close subproof,
1
|
|
I –
|
|
|
1
|
|
I
|
|
|
1
|
|
I ,
|
|
|
1
|
|
I
|
|
|
close subproof,
0
|
|
E , –
|
Now for the second proof:
|
Line number |
Subproof level |
Formula |
Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
open subproof,
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
E
|
|
|
1
|
|
E
|
|
|
open subproof,
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
E
|
|
|
2
|
|
E ,
|
|
|
close subproof,
open subproof,
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
E ,
|
|
|
close subproof,
1
|
|
I –, –
|
|
|
1
|
|
I
|
|
|
1
|
|
I
|
|
|
close subproof,
0
|
|
E , –
|
And finally, the third proof:
|
Line number |
Subproof level |
Formula |
Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
open subproof,
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
E
|
|
|
1
|
|
I
|
|
|
1
|
|
E ,
|
|
|
1
|
|
I
|
|
|
open subproof,
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
E
|
|
|
2
|
|
E
|
|
|
2
|
|
E ,
|
|
|
2
|
|
E
|
|
|
2
|
|
E
|
|
|
2
|
|
E ,
|
|
|
2
|
|
E ,
|
|
|
close subproof,
1
|
|
I –
|
|
|
1
|
|
I
|
|
|
1
|
|
I
|
|
|
1
|
|
I ,
|
|
|
close subproof,
0
|
|
E , –
|
D. Symbolize the following argument
There is exactly one F.
There is exactly one G.
Nothing is both F and G.
-
∴
There are exactly two things that are either F or G.
And offer a proof of it.
-
∴
|
Line number |
Subproof level |
Formula |
Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
open subproof,
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
E
|
|
|
1
|
|
E
|
|
|
1
|
|
E
|
|
|
1
|
|
DS ,
|
|
|
open subproof,
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
E
|
|
|
2
|
|
E
|
|
|
open subproof,
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
E ,
|
|
|
3
|
|
E ,
|
|
|
close subproof,
2
|
|
I –
|
|
|
open subproof,
3
|
|
|
|
|
open subproof,
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
E
|
|
|
4
|
|
E ,
|
|
|
4
|
|
I
|
|
|
close subproof,
open subproof,
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
E
|
|
|
4
|
|
E ,
|
|
|
4
|
|
I
|
|
|
close subproof,
3
|
|
E , –, –
|
|
|
close subproof,
2
|
|
I –
|
|
|
2
|
|
I
|
|
|
2
|
|
I ,
|
|
|
2
|
|
I
|
|
|
2
|
|
I
|
|
|
close subproof,
1
|
|
E , –
|
|
|
close subproof,
0
|
|
E , –
|