Solutions to Chapter 38 Conversion of quantifiers

A. Show in each case that the sentences are inconsistent:

  1. 1.

    SaT(m),T(m)S(a),T(m)¬S(a)

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    S(a)T(m)

    2

    0
    T(m)S(a)

    3

    0
    T(m)¬S(a)

    4

    0
    T(m)
    E 3

    5

    0
    ¬S(a)
    E 3

    6

    0
    S(a)
    E 2, 4

    7

    0
    ¬E 5, 6
  2. 2.

    ¬xR(x,a),xyR(y,x)

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    ¬xR(x,a)

    2

    0
    xyR(y,x)

    3

    0
    x¬R(x,a)
    CQ 1

    4

    0
    ¬R(b,a)
    E 3

    5

    0
    yR(y,a)
    E 2

    6

    0
    R(b,a)
    E 5

    7

    0
    ¬E 6, 4
  3. 3.

    ¬xyL(x,y),L(a,a)

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    ¬xyL(x,y)

    2

    0
    L(a,a)

    3

    0
    x¬yL(x,y)
    CQ 1

    4

    0
    ¬yL(a,y)
    E 3

    5

    0
    y¬L(a,y)
    CQ 4

    6

    0
    ¬L(a,a)
    E 5

    7

    0
    ¬E 2, 6
  4. 4.

    x(P(x)Q(x)),z(P(z)R(z)),yP(y),¬Q(a)¬R(b)

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    x(P(x)Q(x))

    2

    0
    z(P(z)R(z))

    3

    0
    yP(y)

    4

    0
    ¬Q(a)¬R(b)

    5

    0
    ¬Q(a)
    E 4

    6

    0
    P(a)Q(a)
    E 1

    7

    0
    ¬P(a)
    MT 6, 5

    8

    0
    P(a)
    E 3

    9

    0
    ¬E 8, 7

B. Show that each pair of sentences is interderivable:

  1. 1.

    x(A(x)¬B(x)),¬x(A(x)B(x))

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    x(A(x)¬B(x))

    2

    open subproof, 1
    x(A(x)B(x))

    3

    open subproof, 2
    A(a)B(a)

    4

    2
    A(a)
    E 3

    5

    2
    B(a)
    E 3

    6

    2
    A(a)¬B(a)
    E 1

    7

    2
    ¬B(a)
    E 6, 4

    8

    2
    ¬E 5, 7

    9

    close subproof, 1
    E 2, 38

    10

    close subproof, 0
    ¬x(A(x)B(x))
    ¬I 29

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    ¬x(A(x)B(x))

    2

    0
    x¬(A(x)B(x))
    CQ 1

    3

    0
    ¬(A(a)B(a))
    E 2

    4

    open subproof, 1
    A(a)

    5

    open subproof, 2
    B(a)

    6

    2
    A(a)B(a)
    I 4, 5

    7

    2
    ¬E 6, 3

    8

    close subproof, 1
    ¬B(a)
    ¬I 57

    9

    close subproof, 0
    A(a)¬B(a)
    I 48

    10

    0
    x(A(x)¬B(x))
    I 9
  2. 2.

    x(¬A(x)B(d)),xA(x)B(d)

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    x(¬A(x)B(d))

    2

    0
    ¬A(a)B(d)
    E 1

    3

    open subproof, 1
    B(d)

    4

    1
    xA(x)B(d)
    I 6

    5

    close subproof, open subproof, 1
    ¬B(d)

    6

    1
    ¬¬A(a)
    MT 2, 5

    7

    1
    A(a)
    DNE 6

    8

    1
    xA(x)
    E 7

    9

    1
    xA(x)B(d)
    I 8

    10

    close subproof, 0
    xA(x)B(d)
    LEM 34, 59

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    xA(x)B(d)

    2

    open subproof, 1
    ¬A(a)

    3

    open subproof, 2
    xA(x)

    4

    2
    A(a)
    E 3

    5

    2
    ¬E 4, 2

    6

    close subproof, 1
    ¬xA(x)
    ¬I 35

    7

    1
    B(d)
    DS 1, 6

    8

    close subproof, 0
    ¬A(a)B(d)
    I 27

    9

    0
    x(A(x)B(d))
    I 8

C. In appendix 24, we considered what happens when we move quantifiers ‘across’ various logical operators. Show that each pair of sentences is interderivable:

  1. 1.

    x(F(x)G(a)),xF(x)G(a)

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    x(F(x)G(a))

    2

    0
    F(b)G(a)
    E 1

    3

    0
    F(b)
    E 2

    4

    0
    G(a)
    E 6

    5

    0
    xF(x)
    I 3

    6

    0
    xF(x)G(a)
    I 5, 4

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    xF(x)G(a)

    2

    0
    xF(x)
    E 1

    3

    0
    G(a)
    E 1

    4

    0
    F(b)
    E 2

    5

    0
    F(b)G(a)
    I 4, 3

    6

    0
    x(F(x)G(a))
    I 5
  2. 2.

    x(F(x)G(a)),xF(x)G(a)

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    x(F(x)G(a))

    2

    open subproof, 1
    F(b)G(a)

    3

    open subproof, 2
    F(b)

    4

    2
    xF(x)
    I 3

    5

    2
    xF(x)G(a)
    I 4

    6

    close subproof, open subproof, 2
    G(a)

    7

    2
    xF(x)G(a)
    I 6

    8

    close subproof, 1
    xF(x)G(a)
    E 2, 35, 67

    9

    close subproof, 0
    xF(x)G(a)
    E 1, 28

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    xF(x)G(a)

    2

    open subproof, 1
    xF(x)

    3

    open subproof, 2
    F(b)

    4

    2
    F(b)G(a)
    I 3

    5

    2
    x(F(x)G(a))
    I 4

    6

    close subproof, 1
    x(F(x)G(a))
    E 2, 35

    7

    close subproof, open subproof, 1
    G(a)

    8

    1
    F(b)G(a)
    I 7

    9

    1
    x(F(x)G(a))
    I 8

    10

    close subproof, 0
    x(F(x)G(a))
    E 1, 26, 79
  3. 3.

    x(G(a)F(x)),G(a)xF(x)

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    x(G(a)F(x))

    2

    0
    G(a)F(b)
    E 1

    3

    open subproof, 1
    G(a)

    4

    1
    F(b)
    E 2, 3

    5

    1
    xF(x)
    I 4

    6

    close subproof, 0
    G(a)xF(x)
    I 35

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    G(a)xF(x)

    2

    open subproof, 1
    G(a)

    3

    1
    xF(x)
    E 1, 2

    4

    1
    F(b)
    E 3

    5

    close subproof, 0
    G(a)F(b)
    I 24

    6

    0
    x(G(a)F(x))
    I 5
  4. 4.

    x(F(x)G(a)),xF(x)G(a)

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    x(F(x)G(a))

    2

    open subproof, 1
    xF(x)

    3

    open subproof, 2
    F(b)

    4

    2
    F(b)G(a)
    E 1

    5

    2
    G(a)
    E 4, 3

    6

    close subproof, 1
    G(a)
    E 2, 35

    7

    close subproof, 0
    xF(x)G(a)
    I 26

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    xF(x)G(a)

    2

    open subproof, 1
    F(b)

    3

    1
    xF(x)
    I 2

    4

    1
    G(a)
    E 1, 3

    5

    close subproof, 0
    F(b)G(a)
    I 24

    6

    0
    x(F(x)G(a))
    I 5
  5. 5.

    x(G(a)F(x)),G(a)xF(x)

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    x(G(a)F(x))

    2

    open subproof, 1
    G(a)

    3

    open subproof, 2
    G(a)F(b)

    4

    2
    F(b)
    E 3, 2

    5

    2
    xF(x)
    I 4

    6

    close subproof, 1
    xF(x)
    E 1, 35

    7

    close subproof, 0
    G(a)xF(x)
    I 26

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    G(a)xF(x)

    2

    open subproof, 1
    G(a)

    3

    1
    xF(x)

    4

    open subproof, 2
    F(b)

    5

    open subproof, 3
    G(a)

    6

    3
    F(b)
    R 4

    7

    close subproof, 2
    G(a)F(b)
    I 56

    8

    2
    x(G(a)F(x))
    I 7

    9

    close subproof, 1
    x(G(a)F(x))
    E 3, 48

    10

    close subproof, open subproof, 1
    ¬G(a)

    11

    open subproof, 2
    G(a)

    12

    2
    ¬E 11, 10

    13

    2
    F(b)
    X 12

    14

    close subproof, 1
    G(a)F(b)
    E 1113

    15

    1
    x(G(a)F(x))
    I 14

    16

    close subproof, 0
    x(G(a)F(x))
    LEM 29, 1015
  6. 6.

    x(F(x)G(a)),xF(x)G(a)

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    x(F(x)G(a))

    2

    open subproof, 1
    xF(x)

    3

    open subproof, 2
    F(b)G(a)

    4

    2
    F(b)
    E 2

    5

    2
    G(a)
    E 3, 4

    6

    close subproof, 1
    G(a)
    E 1, 35

    7

    close subproof, 0
    xF(x)G(a)
    I 26

    Line number

    Subproof level

    Formula

    Justification

    1

    0
    xF(x)G(a)

    2

    open subproof, 1
    xF(x)

    3

    1
    G(a)
    E 1, 2

    4

    open subproof, 2
    F(b)

    5

    2
    G(a)
    R 3

    6

    close subproof, 1
    F(b)G(a)
    I 45

    7

    1
    x(F(x)G(a))
    I 6

    8

    close subproof, open subproof, 1
    ¬xF(x)

    9

    1
    x¬F(x)
    CQ 8

    10

    open subproof, 2
    ¬F(b)

    11

    open subproof, 3
    F(b)

    12

    3
    ¬E 11, 10

    13

    3
    G(a)
    X 12

    14

    close subproof, 2
    F(b)G(a)
    I 1113

    15

    2
    x(F(x)G(a))
    I 14

    16

    close subproof, 1
    x(F(x)G(a))
    E 9, 1015

    17

    close subproof, 0
    x(F(x)G(a))
    LEM 27, 816